The efficacy of positive psychological interventions from non-western countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v8i1.711Keywords:
positive psychology interventions, wellbeing, positive mental health, cross-cultural,Abstract
Recently, there has been a sharply incremental number of studies of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) from non-western countries. The aim of this study is to review and evaluate the efficacy of these PPIs. Databases, including PubMed, PsycInfo, and Scopus, were searched up to December 2017. In addition, we performed hand searches and reference checks. After removal of duplicates, 7,516 studies were screened and finally 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects model was used to calculate between group effect-sizes at post-test. Results showed that PPIs from non-western countries have a moderate effect on subjective well-being (g = 0.48) and psychological well-being (g = 0.40), and a large effect on depression (g = 0.62) and anxiety (g = 0.95). The overall low study quality of the studies indicates the possibility of biases, which may explain why PPIs from non-western countries report larger effect sizes than PPIs from western countries. However, PPIs could also be more effective in non-western countries due to a better cultural fit.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).