Employee experiences of digital workplace well-being programmes: A qualitative meta-synthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v16i3.5549Abstract
Abstract: This meta-synthesis sought to understand employee experiences of digital workplace well-being programmes to inform their future design, implementation, and research. Twenty-nine publications were identified by database searches (Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global). Five themes were developed: 'valuable', 'usability', 'shame and stigma', 'contextual factors', and 'inadequate and counterproductive'. Findings reflect the domains of the Technology Acceptance Model, and we suggest ways to enhance engagement in programmes. Given the low quality of existing primary studies, future research should focus on methodological rigour and transparent reporting of methodology.
Practitioner Points:
- Digital well-being programmes are valued by employees for their usefulness, accessibility, and ability to support self-awareness.
- Successful uptake depends on ease of use, as well as addressing barriers such as time constraints, perceived organisational support of use, and stigma.
- Irrelevant content can reduce engagement and may even be counterproductive.
- Employers can support engagement by providing employees with time and appropriate environments to use the programmes, and involving employees in programme selection to ensure relevance and fit.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Louise Cowpertwait, Sandham Margaret, Kim Arrowsmith, Mina Nichols-Boyd, Rebecca Jarden

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


International Journal of Wellbeing | ISSN 1179-8602