A scoping review of factors associated with Australian university student wellbeing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v15i1.4063Abstract
Universities have a social obligation to support student wellbeing. Given that university experiences differ across countries, synthesising student wellbeing research within specific national contexts can assist policy makers in identifying research most relevant to local students. A scoping review was conducted to (i) map the factors associated with Australian university student wellbeing, (ii) identify knowledge gaps, and (iii) assess the response rates reported in this literature. 160 studies were included in the review. Associations were reported between wellbeing and 242 different factors. Factors were thematically grouped into psychological, social, demographic, university-specific, lifestyle, aversive life-events, and work-related/financial categories. Several knowledge gaps were identified. These included: Inconsistent wellbeing measurement, non-representative sampling, limited understanding of university-specific factors, limited research identifying at-risk student groups, and absence of interventional studies addressing features of university environments or experiences. Excluding whole-of-university studies, the average response rate was 37.7%, although response rates were lower in online surveys (24.8%) and in studies recruiting whole-of-university samples (5.6%). In-class surveys received the highest response rates (57.3%). Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps identified in this review.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angus Gilmore, Claire Ashton-James, Amy McNeilage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).