Cognitive forecasting and its link to life satisfaction: An investigation of accurate and optimistic prospection and retrospection.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v12i2.1981Abstract
Prospection can be defined as mental representations of possible futures which individuals use to make daily decisions. The current study aimed to assess the links between a specific type of prospection, cognitive forecasting of life satisfaction, and various wellbeing and illbeing indicators. More specifically, this study aimed to assess individuals’ accuracy at cognitive forecasting, their accuracy at retrospective recall of life satisfaction, and the optimism of their life satisfaction forecasts in relation to wellbeing and illbeing indicators. To assess life satisfaction in the past, present, and future, we used the Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale. Data from 576 English speaking individuals who took part in the International Wellbeing Study was analysed. Results showed that, as expected, individuals who exceeded their predictions of future life satisfaction and those who were accurate had stronger relationships with wellbeing indicators, while individuals who did not meet their expectations had stronger relationships with illbeing indicators. For retrospective recall, contrary to our expectations, individuals who believed their past life satisfaction to be worse than it had been and those who were accurate had stronger relationships with wellbeing indicators, while those who believed their past life satisfaction to be better than it had been had stronger relationships with illbeing indicators. Finally, regarding optimism of forecasts, and also contrary to our expectations, it was found that optimistic individuals had stronger relationships with illbeing indicators, while less optimistic individuals had stronger relationships with wellbeing indicators. Our results are interpreted following the Relative Standards Model.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joline Guitard, Aaron Jarden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The license prevents others from using the work for profit without the express consent of the author(s). The license also prevents the creation of derivative works without the express consent of the author(s). Note that derivative works are very similar in nature to the original. Merely quoting (and appropriately referencing) a passage of a work is not making a derivative of it.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).